Who this guide is for
- Owners preparing to approach court suppliers
- Club committees running a fair comparison process
- Project leads scoping work before requesting proposals
- Anyone wanting a neutral framework for supplier evaluation
Start with a clear, shared scope
Suppliers can only be compared fairly when they are responding to the same scope. Define the work as precisely as you can, including the court type, surface, enclosure, lighting and drainage expectations, and note where you are seeking the supplier's expertise rather than dictating an answer.
An ambiguous scope produces proposals that cannot be compared, so invest time here before approaching anyone.
- Describe the court type and intended use
- State surface, enclosure, lighting and drainage expectations
- Mark where you want the supplier's recommendations
- Keep the scope identical across all suppliers you approach
Comparison criteria that travel across suppliers
Decide your criteria before you receive proposals. Relevant experience, clarity of proposal, how risks and exclusions are handled, and the questions a supplier asks you can all be more telling than headline impressions. Documenting criteria keeps the comparison consistent.
Avoid anchoring on any single factor; a balanced view across several criteria is usually more reliable.
- Set criteria before proposals arrive
- Weigh relevant experience and proposal clarity
- Note how each supplier handles risk and exclusions
- Record comparisons rather than relying on memory
Questions, references and verification
Strong questions reveal how a supplier works. Ask about their approach to site conditions, what they include and exclude, how they handle changes, and how they would coordinate specialist trades. Checking references and verifying claims yourself is part of due diligence; we do not verify or vouch for any supplier.
Treat vague answers and reluctance to clarify as signals worth noting.
Keeping the decision defensible
A documented process protects you. Recording your scope, criteria, questions and the answers received makes the final choice easier to justify and easier to revisit if circumstances change. It also gives the chosen supplier a clearer brief to work from.
Independent advice on contracts and technical scope is worth seeking before committing.
Supplier selection checklist
- 1Have you written a clear, shared scope for all suppliers?
- 2Have you set comparison criteria before receiving proposals?
- 3Have you prepared consistent questions for each supplier?
- 4Have you asked how risks and exclusions are handled?
- 5Have you checked references and verified claims yourself?
- 6Have you noted how each supplier coordinates specialists?
- 7Have you documented comparisons rather than relying on memory?
- 8Have you sought independent advice before committing?
Common mistakes to avoid
- Approaching suppliers with an inconsistent or vague scope
- Letting one headline factor dominate the comparison
- Skipping reference checks and independent verification
- Failing to clarify exclusions and change handling
- Choosing without documenting how the decision was reached
When to involve a professional
- Seek independent advice on contracts and technical scope before committing to any supplier.
- Have qualified professionals review site, base, drainage, lighting and structural assumptions, which vary by site.
- Confirm local requirements affecting the works with appropriate advisers, as they vary by location.
- Confirm official court dimensions and standards with the relevant federation, supplier or designer.
Frequently asked questions
Questions readers ask about this topic
Which supplier do you recommend?
We do not recommend, rank or rate suppliers. HELPERG LLC publishes educational guidance only. Supplier selection is your decision, ideally informed by independent advice and your own verification.
How do I compare proposals fairly?
Give every supplier the same scope and set your comparison criteria before proposals arrive. Documenting both keeps the comparison consistent and the decision defensible.
What questions reveal the most?
Questions about site conditions, inclusions and exclusions, change handling and coordination of specialists tend to be revealing. Vague answers are themselves a useful signal.
Should I check references?
Yes, verifying claims and checking references is part of your due diligence. We do not verify or vouch for any supplier, so independent checking is important.
Keep reading