Skip to main content
HELPERG Ecosystem
Build Design HubBuild Design Hub

Construction · Decision · Floors

Slab, Suspended Timber or Beam and Block

Published

Three ground floors sit next to one another in the reference library, each carrying a link to the others marked only as an alternative. That is correct for an encyclopedia entry, which may describe one construction but may not say when it should be preferred. It is unhelpful when an engineer has offered you two options and you cannot hear what separates them.

This guide sets out the questions the three are answering, which are not the same question asked three ways. It also sets out the boundary case the library settles with a single test, where an element that looks like a ground floor is actually the building's foundation and belongs in a different family entirely.

Nothing here indicates what any particular plot needs. Which ground floor suits a site follows from ground investigation carried out on that plot and from structural design by a qualified engineer working with it.

Who this guide is for

  • Owners and self-builders reading an engineer's early ground floor options
  • Anyone offered two ground floor proposals who cannot tell what separates them
  • Buyers trying to understand what a survey or a drawing set is describing
  • Owners planning an extension that has to meet an existing ground floor
  • Anyone whose landscaping or drainage work will reach a floor already built

The three are answers to different problems

A ground floor has to do two things that pull apart: carry what stands on it, and deal with the ground immediately beneath it. One construction lays the floor onto ground that has been prepared to receive it. The other two hold the floor clear of the ground and span across the gap, and they differ in what does the spanning.

That is the whole shape of the decision. Once you know whether the design intends to bear on the ground or span over it, and if it spans, what material is doing the spanning, the rest of the conversation becomes legible.

  • Bearing on prepared ground, with layers above dealing with moisture and heat
  • Spanning over a ventilated void on timber members
  • Spanning over a ventilated void on precast concrete beams with infill
  • The separate case where the floor is also carrying the building

Ground-bearing: prepared ground does the carrying

A ground-bearing floor slab lets the lowest floor rest on ground that has been prepared and consolidated. That ground takes the floor loading directly, and the layers above exist to interrupt moisture and, where investigation calls for it, soil gas, to place the floor at a chosen thermal position, and to give the finish something flat and stable to bear on.

What distinguishes the assembly from its ingredients is that the layers are not interchangeable in position. Concrete, insulation and a barrier sheet each mean something different depending on where in the stack they sit, and the same materials in a different order produce a floor with different behaviour, different edge details and different limits on what may be laid over it.

Suspended timber: the void is a working part of the floor

A suspended timber ground floor holds the deck clear of the ground on joists bearing on the perimeter walls and, where the span asks for it, on low intermediate walls beneath. The gap left below is not waste space. Air moves across it from one side of the building to the other and carries away moisture that would otherwise collect against the timber.

The library is explicit that this ventilation exists for the sake of the floor itself. The structure is organic and has to be kept dry, so the openings serving the void are part of the floor even though they sit in the walls. Blocking them is not a cosmetic decision, and it is the intervention this floor is least able to absorb.

Beam and block: the same void, spanned in concrete

A beam and block floor spans the same kind of void, but the spanning is done by precast concrete beams with blocks dropped between them and a grout, levelling or structural topping worked over the surface. The consequence of the material change is direct: a concrete deck is indifferent to the humidity of the void beneath it, so the ventilation there exists for the ground rather than for the floor.

The topping is the component most often mistaken for a finish, and the entry says why the mistake matters. In some designs it only fills the joints; in others it is a reinforced layer that joins the separate units into a plate the walls beneath rely on. The two look alike once laid, and which one a design intended is a question for the structural engineer.

Looking into the void tells you which one it is

The library settles the timber-against-concrete question with an observation rather than an argument: look into the void and see what spans it. Timber joists here, precast beams with block infill there. Everything else follows from that, including whether the ventilation is protecting the structure or the ground.

The boundary case: when the floor is the foundation

A raft and a ground-bearing slab look identical once cast, and the library settles them with one question: what bears on the element. If the load-bearing walls, columns or piers stand on it and it takes them into the ground, it is a raft and belongs with the foundations. If those elements bear elsewhere and the element carries only floor loading, it is a floor.

The answer is not academic. It changes the reinforcement, the deepened zones underneath that carry line and point loads into the plate, whether wall lines have to sit over those zones, and what cutting an opening through the element means years later. A drawing labelled as a slab that carries walls is describing a raft whatever the title block says.

Following the decision without trying to make it

You are not being asked to choose. You are being asked to recognise which question is being answered, so that a later alteration — a new drain, a raised patio, an extension across a ventilated wall — is discussed against the floor that was actually built rather than the one you assumed was there.

Following the ground floor decision

  1. 1Establish whether the design intends the floor to bear on the ground or span over it.
  2. 2If it spans, establish what is doing the spanning and what that material needs from the void.
  3. 3Ask what ground investigation was carried out on this plot and what it found.
  4. 4Confirm whether any part of the building's structure bears on the floor element itself.
  5. 5Where a void is proposed, ask how it is ventilated and on which walls the openings sit.
  6. 6Ask what finished external ground level the design assumes against each wall.
  7. 7Where a topping is shown, ask whether it is levelling or structural, and who determined that.
  8. 8Establish where the thermal layer sits relative to the structural layer, and why.
  9. 9Ask which drawing shows the floor barrier meeting the damp course in the wall.
  10. 10List the services crossing the floor line and ask when their positions are fixed.
  11. 11Ask whether the void, if there is one, can be entered for inspection later.
  12. 12Keep the investigation report and the floor drawings together as one record for the building.

Common mistakes to avoid

  • Choosing a ground floor from what a neighbouring plot used, when ground can change sharply over short distances.
  • Treating a ventilated void as dead space to be filled, when it is what keeps a timber floor dry.
  • Assuming a concrete deck needs no ventilation beneath it, when the void there is ventilated for the ground's sake.
  • Reading a topping as a levelling layer, when in many designs it is what makes separate units act as one plate.
  • Calling any slab on the ground a foundation, when it becomes one only where the building's structure bears on it.
  • Fixing a floor covering choice after the base is built, when the base is normally specified around the covering.
  • Raising external ground levels later, which can close the very openings a suspended floor depends on.

When to involve a professional

  • Which ground floor suits a site is determined by a qualified structural engineer using ground investigation carried out on that plot.
  • Whether a site calls for ground gas protection follows from ground investigation and is a specialist design and verification matter.
  • Slab thickness, reinforcement, beam layouts, bearings and topping design are structural decisions and sit outside the scope of any reference entry.
  • Nothing here states a depth, a span, a ventilation provision or a thermal outcome, and none can be inferred from it.

Frequently asked questions

Questions readers ask about this topic

How do I tell a floor slab from a raft?

By what stands on it. If the building's load-bearing walls and columns bear on the element and it takes them into the ground, it is a raft foundation. If they are carried elsewhere and the element takes only floor loading, it is a ground floor slab.

Why does a concrete floor need a ventilated void under it?

The void is not ventilated for the deck's sake. Concrete is indifferent to the humidity beneath it, so the openings exist to let moving air carry ground moisture away from under the floor and the walls around it.

Can I fill the void under a suspended timber floor?

Doing so converts the floor into a different assembly with a different moisture strategy, and it removes ventilation other parts of the building may depend on. Whether that can be done at all is a building physics judgement for a qualified professional.

Is the topping on a beam and block floor just levelling?

Sometimes, and sometimes not. Where the design treats the floor as a plate bracing the walls, the topping and its reinforcement are what join separate units into that plate. The two are not interchangeable and cannot be told apart by looking.

Why will nobody tell me which floor is best?

Because the answer depends on ground that has been investigated on your plot, on the loads arriving, on levels and on access. The reference entries describe each construction and deliberately decline to rank them, since ranking without a site is meaningless.

Keep reading

Related guides and sections