Building envelope · Junctions & Terminations
Cavity Tray and Weep System
Presents cavity trays as a rule about where they are required rather than as a product, and shows why a tray, its stop ends and its weeps have no value except as a complete and continuous set.
Educational reference entry. How this system behaves depends on climate, jurisdiction, loading, substrate, the adjacent systems it meets, how the building is used, the manufacturer's instructions and qualified professional design.
Overview
What cavity trays is
A cavity works because water crossing the outer leaf can keep falling until it reaches somewhere it can leave. Anything that stops the fall turns the cavity into a shelf: a lintel over an opening, a floor edge, a roof arriving against the wall, or a change from one construction to another. The base of the cavity is the one interruption that belongs elsewhere: there, water falling inside the cavity and moisture rising from the ground arrive at the same element, and the damp proof barrier continuity system owns it. A tray is what gives the interrupted water a route back out.
The parts have almost no individual value and become reliable only as a set. A tray without stop ends is a chute that discharges into the wall at each end. A tray without weeps is a shelf holding water above the interruption. Weeps with no tray behind them drain nothing at all while looking entirely correct from the pavement.
The nearest neighbouring entry is the roof-to-wall abutment and flashing system, and a reader can separate them by looking for the roof. A cavity tray is defined by geometry rather than by material and appears wherever a cavity is interrupted, including in long stretches of wall with no roof anywhere near them. An abutment is the particular case where a roof causes the interruption, and it needs cover flashings on the outer face as well as a tray within.
Terminology
Common names and aliases
These names describe the same assembly. The encyclopedia keeps one entry per system so that a trade term or a regional name never becomes a second, thinner page.
- through-wall flashing
- cavity damp-proof tray
- tray and weep detail
- cavity flashing arrangement
Purpose
What this system is intended to do
The job the assembly exists to perform, conceptually. An intention is not a guarantee that any particular build achieves it.
- Collect water descending within a cavity at the point where the cavity is bridged, stopped or otherwise interrupted.
- Carry that water across the interruption and discharge it back to the outer face rather than to the inner leaf.
- Close the ends of each run so that collected water leaves where intended and not into the surrounding wall.
- Keep the arrangement continuous where separate trays meet, so a junction between them is not a gap.
Composition
The roles this system is made of
What each part does in the assembly and what it depends on — never a product, a thickness, a fixing or a determination that anything is adequate for the role.
This system is itself the junction between two others, so there is no build-up to read. The roles below are the conditions that have to be resolved where those systems meet, and no order is implied between them.
- Control layerTray across the interruption
The sheet, preformed unit or bonded strip that spans the cavity above whatever has interrupted it, sloping outward. It is the collecting surface, and everything else in the assembly exists to make what it collects go somewhere useful.
- Edge and terminationUpstand against the inner leaf
The turned-up back edge dressed against the inner leaf and held there. Water running down the inner face of the cavity has to be caught above the tray line rather than behind it, which is what the upstand is for.
- Edge and terminationStop ends
The closed ends of each tray run, formed or preformed, that stop collected water from simply leaving sideways. They are the component most often omitted and the one whose absence produces damp in the least intuitive place.
- Drainage planeWeep openings at the outer face
The unfilled joints or formed openings in the outer leaf immediately above the tray, through which collected water leaves. Their position relative to the tray matters far more than their appearance, since a weep formed in the wrong course drains nothing at all.
- Primary supportThe interruption being spanned
The lintel, floor edge, roof upstand, base of cavity or change of construction that stopped the water in the first place. It determines where the tray goes, so a structural or geometric decision is what generates the requirement.
- AttachmentBedding, laps and joints between runs
The bedding into the masonry and the lapped or bonded joints where one tray meets the next. Laps are directional, so a joint between two correctly installed trays can still be a break if it was formed the wrong way round.
Interaction
How the parts work together
The reason this is a system rather than a list of parts: what depends on what, and what stops working when one part is changed.
The set behaves as a chain, and a missing link relocates the problem rather than reducing it. Without stop ends, a tray discharges into the wall beyond the ends of the opening, so damp appears to one side of a window rather than above it and is diagnosed as something else entirely. Without weeps, the tray holds what it collects until the water finds the top of the upstand or a joint in the tray, which puts it on the inner leaf at the one point specifically arranged to protect it.
The upstand only works if nothing bridges over the top of it. Insulation packed hard against both leaves, mortar droppings resting on the tray, or a wall tie sloping the wrong way above the tray line all give water a path from the outer leaf to the inner leaf that passes over the whole arrangement. The tray is then in sound condition and entirely irrelevant, which is why an inspection that has found the tray has not finished asking questions.
Continuity between separate trays is where the requirement and the programme collide. Trays over openings, at floor edges and at abutments are frequently installed by different trades at different stages, and each is correct within its own run. Where two runs meet, one has to lap over the other in the direction the water travels, and a butt joint between two well-formed trays is a break in the middle of an otherwise continuous arrangement.
Materials
Material families commonly met in each role
Commonly encountered, not recommended. Whether a material suits a given project depends on the whole assembly, the exposure, the manufacturer's documentation and qualified professional review.
Control layer
Flexible sheet and bonded strip families of this kind are commonly encountered forming the collecting surface. Whether a product tolerates the bedding, the loading above it and the geometry of a particular run is a matter for its documentation and the designer.
Edge and termination
Preformed trays, corner units and stop ends are commonly encountered in these families. Corrosion pairing with adjacent metals and with the mortar around them is a design determination and is not settled on this page.
Drainage plane
Weep openings are commonly encountered formed within the outer leaf itself, at the perpend joints of these families, rather than as a separate manufactured component. Where and how they are formed is a design and workmanship matter.
Attachment
Ties and bedding are commonly encountered holding the arrangement in place and, when misplaced, defeating it. How a tie crosses the cavity in relation to a tray is a detailing matter for the designer rather than a site decision.
Primary support
The interruptions that generate the requirement are commonly encountered in these families. What supports an opening or a floor edge is a structural determination for a qualified engineer, and only its consequence for the cavity is discussed here.
Junctions
Where this system meets others
Interfaces are where most assemblies actually fail, so they are set out explicitly rather than left inside the prose. What resolves a junction is a detail designed for the specific building — not a rule of thumb.
The drained cavity the trays serve
A cavity wall supplies the drained space this system exists to protect. Every decision that interrupts that space, whether structural, thermal or architectural, creates a tray requirement whether or not anyone drew one.
Read about Twin-Leaf Cavity Wall →Trays above openings
The tray over a head is part of the opening perimeter as well as part of this system, and the two are often drawn by different people. Where the tray lacks stop ends, the resulting damp at the reveals is routinely attributed to the window.
Read about Window Opening Interface →Trays where a roof meets the wall
An abutment needs a tray inside the wall as well as flashings outside it, and the tray belongs to the masonry trade while the flashing belongs to the roofer. The junction between their two pieces of work is inside the wall where neither can see it.
Read about Abutment Detail →Trays in a veneer over a framed backup
Where the inner leaf is a framed wall rather than masonry, the upstand is dressed against a sheathed and membraned face instead of a blockwork one. What the tray has to be bonded or lapped to changes completely, though the geometry does not.
Read about Masonry Veneer Wall →Filling a cavity that already has interruptions
Introducing fill into an existing cavity changes what the trays are dealing with and reveals whether they were ever installed. Existing walls frequently have interruptions with no tray at all, which is a survey question rather than an assumption.
Read about Retrofit Cavity Fill →
Considerations
Topics worth discussing
Which topics genuinely apply to this system and what to raise about them. Measured values, classes and ratings come from a qualified professional's design for the specific building, not from a reference page.
- Moisture
- This system assumes water is already inside the cavity, which is the ordinary condition of a drained wall rather than a fault. What it manages is where that water goes when its downward route is blocked, and the answer is only ever back to the outer face.
- Buildability
- Trays are installed within a wall as it is built, by a trade whose main task is laying masonry. Preformed units, clear marking of runs and inspection of stop ends before the next courses go on are what turn a drawn detail into an installed one.
- Interfaces
- The requirement is generated by other people's decisions: a structural change, a new opening, a roof arriving, an insulation upgrade. Because no single package owns cavity interruptions, the tray is frequently the item that nobody realised was needed.
- Durability
- A tray is permanently within the wall and cannot be renewed without taking masonry down, so its exposure to alkaline mortar, to compression and to the metals around it is a long-term matter settled at the outset rather than adjusted later.
- Maintenance and access
- Weep openings are the only visible part of the arrangement, and they are routinely filled during repointing, rendering or painting by someone who reads them as defects. Recording their purpose is the only realistic protection an owner has.
Design
Questions the design has to answer
The decisions this assembly turns on. They are questions rather than answers, because the answer depends on the building.
- Where in this wall is the cavity interrupted, and has each of those interruptions been reviewed for a tray?
- Does each tray run have stop ends, and are they shown on the drawing rather than assumed on site?
- Are the weep openings positioned in the course immediately above the tray, so that what is collected can actually leave?
- Where two separate tray runs meet, which one laps over the other and in which direction does the water travel?
- What crosses the cavity above the tray line, and could any of it carry water over the upstand?
- In an existing wall, has anyone established whether trays are present at the interruptions that already exist?
Boundaries
Commonly misunderstood points
Distinctions that are easy to blur, and the places where a familiar term means something narrower than it sounds.
- A cavity is thought of as a dry void, when it is a drained space in which water crossing the outer leaf is expected and simply needs somewhere to go.
- Weep openings are read as holes in the wall and filled in during repointing or decorating, which converts a working tray into a reservoir.
- Damp above an interruption is assumed to indicate a failed tray, when a tray without stop ends most often produces damp to one side of the opening instead.
- The tray is treated as a material choice, when the substantive question is where a tray is required, and that is answered by the geometry of the wall rather than by any product.
Conversations
Questions for qualified professionals
Bring these to the relevant qualified professional, manufacturer or authority. Requirements vary by project and location.
- Which interruptions in this wall have been identified as requiring a tray, and how was that list arrived at?
- How is continuity being achieved where separate tray runs meet at corners, abutments and floor edges?
- What is proposed to stop insulation, mortar or ties from bridging above the tray line?
- How will the trays and their stop ends be inspected before the following courses conceal them?
- In this existing building, what evidence is there about whether trays were installed at all?
What this page does not do
- Resistance to water reaching the inner leaf is a property of the whole completed wall and its detailing, not of a tray, a stop end or a weep considered alone.
- Whether a tray is required at a given interruption, and what form it should take, depends on the construction, the exposure and qualified professional design.
- Nothing here should be read as guidance for altering an existing wall, where the presence, condition and position of trays can only be established by survey.
Related systems
How this system relates to others
Every link states what the relationship actually is, rather than leaving a bare list of related pages to be read as a suggestion.
Meets these systems
Systems this one physically meets. The junction is usually where the design problem lives, so these are worth reading together.
Go deeper
Related Build Design Hub guides
Planning guidance behind the decisions this assembly involves.
Preparation
Related planning checklists
Owner-side preparation before the conversation where this system comes up.
Inspiration
Related Ideas Library pages
Design directions where this system commonly appears.
Envelope Junctions, Interfaces and Terminations
The places where continuous layers stop, turn, change plane or are pierced, and several duties collide inside a very small amount of construction.
Browse all junctions & terminations entries →